Findings

I created an affinity map on Miroboard which can be viewed here:

https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNxajSsI=/?moveToWidget=3458764585709196253&cot=14

These are the findings summarised (it is the same as what is on the Miro board):

Visual design

Visual design overall works but need to ensure that have graphics at the start of sections as well. Also worth considering that the logo and title could permeate the design more throughout.

Photo feature

Photo feature was used this time - participants that had not noticed it in previous iteration saw it and were excited by it this time.

Unexpected photo feature bonus: useful for my multilingual participants for whom English isn’t their native language.

Time Division

The time division works, the understanding of the user was correct.

Swap page

Swap page was only explored by 1/5 participants as part of initial search and was with most adventurous participant even though is spoken about during onboarding. It went mostly unnoticed by participants but those that saw it liked it when they saw it and understood how it worked. It does seem to be a good feature but it needs to be more visible to the user somehow.